The bulk update request #7848 has been rejected.

create implication winning_at_69 (58) -> 69_position (13043)
create implication forced_69 (23) -> 69_position (13043)
create implication forced_69 (23) -> forced_oral (11491)
create implication forced_69 (23) -> reverse_forced_oral (1312)

Reason: For a character to "win" at 69 (make their partner too pleasured to continue giving oral while 69'ing), the characters must be 69'ing.

If two characters are forced to 69, they are forced into the 69_position and also forced to both give and receive oral.
----------------------------------
Notes:

• I'm not sure if forced_69 also requires bound_together?
• I'm not sure what partial_69_position means. Perhaps it should just be aliased to 69_position?
• I'm not sure what to do with vertical_69_position (30 posts). If we want to keep it, standing_69_position (323 posts) could imply it, since standing is inherently vertical.

EDIT: The bulk update request #7848 (forum #402954) has been rejected by @CrocoGator.

"Winning at 69" sounds too ambiguous and vague to be useful, IMO. How do you "win" at 69ing? The wiki just gives the opinion that it's when one character stops because of pleasure, but that's a normal part of sex; it's pleasurable and eventually it stops, and not always the two partners simultaneously. post #4282244 is the character forced to stop because of the pleasure? Has he not started yet? Admiring the view? Just taking a breath? post #4084483 he already came before her, given the cum in her mouth. post #4126323 he stopped to talk, and it transitioned to facesitting. It looks to me it's just looking_pleasured+69_position. It doesn't need a specific tag with a vague "winning" concept thrown in that's open to interpretation.

forced_69 seems like forced+69_position. A poorly used tag that just means both is unnecessary, IMO.

The bulk update request #7848 (forum #402954) has been rejected by @CrocoGator.