The tag implication #62421 andromorph_(lore)/gynomorph_(lore) -> intersex_(lore) has been rejected.

Reason: Both are intersex

EDIT: The tag implication andromorph_(lore)/gynomorph_(lore) -> intersex_(lore) (forum #403174) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.

Did you mean to have andromorph_(lore) and separately gynomorph_(lore) imply intersex_(lore)? Because your current suggestion involves a single tag called andromorph_(lore)/gynomorph_(lore)

To be honest, I feel like intersex_(lore) should stay on its own. In the context of lore, not all andromorph/gynomorph characters are intersex, some are trans. It's similar to why I want genderfluid_(lore) and agender_(lore) (one day...) separate from nonbinary_(lore), since not all characters that fit those identify as nonbinary.

Also, intersex_(lore) is sometimes used in reference to the actual real-world meaning of intersex:

post #3618744

nimphia said:
not all andromorph/gynomorph characters are intersex, some are trans.

Andromorph and gynomorph (and herm) are by definition intersex. They are inter-sex, having a mix of sexual characteristics of both males and females. Whether or not they're trans is a separate thing, since intersex is about their sex, and trans is about their identity (a character can be intersex without being trans, or be trans without being intersex).

Check out the corrected version of these implications over at topic #39872
I would like to see more opinions on that one

The tag implication andromorph_(lore)/gynomorph_(lore) -> intersex_(lore) (forum #403174) has been rejected by @Rainbow_Dash.